High-Quality Course Design Program

A Scalable Framework for Building Measurably Excellent Online Courses

Angela Westmoreland, M.Ed. — Instructional Designer

The Problem We Solved

Courses built without a framework produce inconsistent quality, unsustainable faculty workload, and compliance gaps that surface too late to fix.

Grading Overload

Faculty spend 60–70% of grading time on low-level recall items that could be auto-graded, leaving no bandwidth for meaningful feedback on student writing and analysis.

Engagement Gaps

Courses lack structured, substantive interaction. Students disengage before Week 4. Regular Substantive Interaction (RSI) compliance becomes a last-minute documentation scramble rather than a design feature.

Alignment Drift

Learning objectives, activities, and assessments drift apart over semesters of ad-hoc revision. Quality Matters reviews expose structural gaps too late — after students have already experienced the misalignment.

The HQCDP Model

A discipline-agnostic framework built on four phases and eight modules

Learn

Instructional Content (IC 1–3)

OER readings, videos, primary sources — three content layers per module

Practice

Learning Activities (2 Attempts)

Key terms, identifications, timelines — auto-graded with two attempts for mastery

Apply

Discussion Board & Portfolio Pieces

Analysis, argument, peer engagement — instructor-graded with rubrics

Assess

IC 4 Quiz & Exams

IC 4 primary source quiz per module, plus midterm & final exams

8-Module Framework

1
Module 1
Portfolio Piece Submission
Discussion Board
2
Module 2
Portfolio Piece (saved)
Discussion Board
3
Module 3
Portfolio Piece Submission
Discussion Board
4
Module 4
Portfolio Piece (saved)
Discussion Board
Midterm Exam
5
Module 5
Portfolio Piece Submission
Discussion Board
6
Module 6
Portfolio Piece (saved)
Discussion Board
7
Module 7
Final Portfolio Submission
Discussion Board
8
Module 8
Discussion Board
Final Exam

Every module includes a fourth instructional content layer — a primary source document analyzed through a timed, auto-graded quiz.

1

What Is a Primary Source?

Source types, context, bias recognition

2

Political Documents

Speeches, legislation, treaties

3

Personal Narratives

Diaries, letters, oral histories

4

Visual & Material Culture

Photographs, maps, artifacts

5

Economic Data

Census records, trade logs, labor reports

6

Media & Propaganda

Newspapers, posters, broadcasts

7

Legal Records

Court decisions, constitutional debates

8

Synthesis

Multiple sources on one event

By the Numbers

22/22
QM Standards
48+
RSI Touchpoints
49%
Auto-Graded
$0
Textbook Cost
  • 8 Discussion Boards with required instructor responses
  • 8 Portfolio pieces with individual feedback
  • 8 IC 4 primary-source quizzes with instructor annotations
  • 24+ auto-graded activities with built-in remediation
  • 2 proctored exams with post-exam review

RSI is designed into the architecture — not documented after the fact.

Reading
Practice
Apply
Assess
~5 hrs ~4 hrs ~4 hrs ~3.5 hrs

~16.5 hrs/module × 8 modules + exams = 135 documented hours. Open Calculator →

  • Scaffolded progression: each phase builds on the previous
  • 2 attempts on practice activities reduce test anxiety
  • Low-stakes before high-stakes: auto-graded practice precedes instructor-graded work
  • Consistent structure: same 4-phase pattern every module reduces extraneous load

Proof of Concept

HIS-131: American History I

Pre-Columbian – 1865

  • 8 Modules
  • 26 Activities
  • 49% Auto-Graded
  • 22/22 QM

Portfolio: “What is America?” — national identity narrative

HIS-132: American History II

1865 – Present

  • 8 Modules
  • 26 Activities
  • 49% Auto-Graded
  • 22/22 QM

Portfolio: “What is America?” — continued through modern era

Both courses use identical architecture. The framework replicates — the content adapts.

Additional Dashboards

CIT Dashboard

Computer Information Technology

HUM-130 Dashboard

Introduction to Humanities

Efficiency & Scaling

Design Time Reduction

From Scratch
200 hrs
First HQCDP Course
120 hrs
Second Course
65 hrs
Third+ Courses
45 hrs
With Master Shell
30 hrs

Scaling Roadmap

Spring 2026

Pilot: 2–3 exemplar courses

Summer 2026

Cohort 1: 6–8 faculty trained

Fall 2026

Launch + Cohort 2 begins

Spring 2027+

Institution-wide embedding

Resources & Documentation

HIS-131 Course MapModule-by-module design with QM alignment
HIS-131 Teaching PlanFaculty guide with student-facing language
HIS-132 Course MapFull course architecture for American History II
HIS-132 Teaching PlanModule guides and assessment specifications
HQCDP Strategic FrameworkImplementation plan, FAQ, time analysis, scaling model
QM Alignment Summary22/22 Essential Standards with evidence
Model Course StructureFramework overview and rationale
Teaching Plan TemplateBlank template for new HQCDP courses
HQCDP PresentationSlide deck for institutional audiences
AI Position Statement (v2)AI-assisted instructional design position
AI FAQ (v2)FAQs about AI use in the HQCDP
Workload CalculatorInteractive CITL-based tool
Time Estimation & Quality DesignData-informed estimates for planning
Faculty AI Implementation GuideProcess, needs assessment, PD pathway
Workload Calculation MethodologyCITL-based 135-hour documentation
Presenter Notes & HandoutSlide-by-slide notes with Q&A
Course Builder Bot PromptMaster prompt for HQCDP course generation